I think it's done really well. Is that the new logo design to be used throughout? I think it works very well, especially when reproduced at various sizes, colors, and resolutions. I'd give the spacing to the right of the business name a little more room away from the logo, and maybe a hair more from the car. Maybe a little more space between the 350Z and the "C" in CZP. I how see what the "p" in the logo works when the lower loops meets the decender at the same point (and spacing) as the rest. It might balance things out.. but then again the breathability is nice. The 350Z doesn't look half bad, but the problem is the shadowed panels. I take it that this was made from vector art? It should be fairly easy to switch out filled panels if so. I'd see how the front looked when given a lighter finish and allowing the shadowed sections to stay on the one side competely. Overall, I like it more than the old logo. There's a lot more attention to the type lock-up, spacing, and professional feel. Photoshop is a nice tool, but not showing you used it completely can create some great results at times. My vote is to keep it. Simple design can go a long way.
[Slicktop] & [207 rwhp 188.5 rwtq] 
|